Joined
·
14,258 Posts
Hey Smokin' ? I think he's talking about you. :lolcry:John Hennessey said:Getting a great dyno queen number is only the first step in getting your car to go fast at the dragstrip or from a roll.
Hey Smokin' ? I think he's talking about you. :lolcry:John Hennessey said:Getting a great dyno queen number is only the first step in getting your car to go fast at the dragstrip or from a roll.
Let's talk about air boxes then. I've dyno'd my GTS on 4 different machines since '99 and from 11k to 25k miles. With the exception of a mustang shop in SA that wasn't properly altitude corrected, every one indicated between 410 and 413hp with a fully warmed engine. New u-joints and diff made no measureable difference on my car from my March and December '03 pulls. Stock airbox with smoothies and K&Ns dyno'd the same on a hot, humid day in Houston as the HMS CF box did on a cold, dry day in SA. However, at TWS, my front straight speeds are about 4-6mph higher with the HMS box, and my trap speeds at the strip are up from ~116mph to consistently around 121+ mph. I don't give a rat's ass how much fan you blow at the front end, you will not duplicate the pressure differences at the airbox in real life. Saturday, my cool engine made 8hp more than my warm engine. It was the only time I've seen this "magic" 420hp number for my filters and tubes car.John Hennessey said:Different power adders have different pros/cons as they run down the track:
No Clint, remember it's a decreasing RADIUS issue. The only (easily changeable) distance that affects output torque is the effective loaded radius of the tire.Clint Sever said:Dean - that makes perfect sense, I wasn't thinking of it in a decreasing-diameter sense,