Lower rpms means less fuel being burned...it's not for emissions, it's to meet the government mandated fuel economy requirements...
It saves you another $700 on top of the $3000 gas guzzler tax.Snake Bitten said:Lower rpms means less fuel being burned...it's not for emissions, it's to meet the government mandated fuel economy requirements...
OK, Good answer. But before I bought my snake new I was looking at a '99 in Sacramento and I asked the guy if it had Kali emmisions equipment. He said they all have the skip shift so essentially all Vipers are Kali legal. Was he simply full of shit? Do Vipers sold in Kali have any different emmisions equipment, or are they exempt due to limited production or sumpin?Snake Bitten said:Lower rpms means less fuel being burned...it's not for emissions, it's to meet the government mandated fuel economy requirements...
:squint:RedSnakeGTS said:Craig, the LeBaron does not have skip shift :leaving:
this is true for new vipers.. pre 99 model year vipers needed to be CA certified, but 99+ cars were all 50 state legal..vipernathan said:Every Viper is CA emissions legal.
Craig201MPH said::squint:RedSnakeGTS said:Craig, the LeBaron does not have skip shift :leaving:
Hey, I didn't think my reply sucked /images/graemlins/flip2.gif..Biggest said:I posted this at the morgue, 3 responses in 4 days and they basically sucked. So I'll ask it here:
I've spent the last hour doing a search so sorry if I'm wasting everyones time but I tried to find out on my own.
I know all about the skip shift on my car and how to get around it. What I don't know is the theory behind how that makes for effective emissions control. Common sense tells me that the car runs richer and burns fuel less effeciently when it's in 4th at 15mph. What were they thinking? How does this help pass the Kalifornia emissions tests? Thanks in advance....
Sorry Clint, I forgot you posted there. I said the responses sucked because they didn't seem to address the emissions issue, only the mileage issue. Using less fuel in 4th gear makes sense but it seemed like it would run rich thus screwing up emmisions. I see now your post addressed both, but it still seems whacky. Don't get your panties in a wad! /images/graemlins/smile.gifClint Sever said:Hey, I didn't think my reply sucked /images/graemlins/flip2.gif..
LOL - should've included a smiley.. I wasn't waddingBiggest said:Sorry Clint, I forgot you posted there. I said the responses sucked because they didn't seem to address the emissions issue, only the mileage issue. Using less fuel in 4th gear makes sense but it seemed like it would run rich thus screwing up emmisions. I see now your post addressed both, but it still seems whacky. Don't get your panties in a wad! /images/graemlins/smile.gifClint Sever said:Hey, I didn't think my reply sucked /images/graemlins/flip2.gif..