The links that -Misdirected- posted are an SVS built rear mount turbo on a customers 98 Viper.
I realize that Rhonnie...but the car posted in this thread was not. This was my point.
If its so difficult to grasp that those videos were only added as a generic stab at the sound of a rearmount on a Viper, and not a reference to SVS, autozone, or even Wile E Coyote being the builder of the car, then please add me to your ignore list.
If its so difficult to grasp that those videos were only added as a generic stab at the sound of a rearmount on a Viper, and not a reference to SVS, autozone, or even Wile E Coyote being the builder of the car, then please add me to your ignore list.
This viper is meant to be strong street car not a 1000hp that i cant use on the street, guys down low she can run with the best of them. she needs no headers, heads or cam. sure i can use a t88 and get a 1000hp but 800 is enough.
Whats up turan ? post some videos and pics when u get a chance. You know I have been trying to convince you to put some good cylinder heads and at least 88mm minimum on their.
plumcrazy & redsnake: Back to back dyno pulls and 1/4 mile runs of base Paxton kits and base Roe kits have been known to heat soak and significantly reduce power output which is my reason for posting that they struggle to make 650-700 consistently. On the turbo Vipers I have seen, they don't lose as much power due to heat soak as the supercharged Vipers. Yes, I understand that an upgraded heat exchanger will greatly reduce the heat soak for the paxton equipped Vipers. My argument was just that a base supercharger kit whether roe or paxton, will struggle to make consistent power on back to back runs due to heat soak while a rear mount turbo set-up will not suffer from heat soak on back to back runs and therefore, the rear mount turbo setup will put out more consistent power than the base supercharger kits..
plumcrazy & redsnake: Back to back dyno pulls and 1/4 mile runs of base Paxton kits and base Roe kits have been known to heat soak and significantly reduce power output which is my reason for posting that they struggle to make 650-700 consistently. On the turbo Vipers I have seen, they don't lose as much power due to heat soak as the supercharged Vipers. Yes, I understand that an upgraded heat exchanger will greatly reduce the heat soak for the paxton equipped Vipers. My argument was just that a base supercharger kit whether roe or paxton, will struggle to make consistent power on back to back runs due to heat soak while a rear mount turbo set-up will not suffer from heat soak on back to back runs and therefore, the rear mount turbo setup will put out more consistent power than the base supercharger kits..
Not. I have w/m and make 635 rwhp on back to back pulls, no problem. Heat soak is not a problem on my car. And my torque curve is flat across the page from 2,000 to 6,000 rpms.
Not. I have w/m and make 635 rwhp on back to back pulls, no problem. Heat soak is not a problem on my car. And my torque curve is flat across the page from 2,000 to 6,000 rpms.
I'm sorry maybe I didn't make myself clear enough on my previous 2 posts about base supercharger kits. Base= no water/meth and no upgraded heat exchanger. These heat reduction enhancers are not included with base kits. I know that with a water/meth or an upgraded heat exchanger there are few to no heat soak issues.
nice street numbers, but man, you're diesel exhaust tip is fuckin great. how does the car sound at idle? can you hear the turbo at all? if it sounds like an n/a car you have one amazing sleeper too.
Interesting rear pipe Black Mamba. I'm not knocking it, just never seen a single before. Do you have any pictures from a distance, like from about a car length behind? I'm curious to see what it would look like from a real world perspective at a stop light or something. Also, I would assume that air filter would get crazy dirty from just sitting at idle, at stop lights alone. Was that the only place to mount it? I know the turbo is right there, but I would almost want to pipe the filter away from the rear exhaust a little from how dirty my rear bumper gets. Cool nonetheless....
__________________
94' RT/10
12.1 @ 115 (1.87 60ft) on worn Pilots, cone filters and Dynomax w/no cats-406HP/475TQ
Linear Mode
