Blackmail is the act of threatening to reveal information about a person, or even do something to destroy the threatened person, unless the blackmailed target fulfills certain demands. This information is usually of an embarrassing or socially damaging nature.
This is NOT my m/o. I don't want anything from anyone. Never have.
I never mentioned blackmail, I mentioned defamation. Defamation is typically used as a defensive tactic in a lawsuit. So we have established you made the inquiry, now the question is for what purpose.
So let's get this straight. Macedo's wife dug up a bunch of dirt on Kevin Howeth and passed it around the viper community, because Kevin fixed Kenny's viper?
The BLACKMAILER can be found in the thread below. As I have stated before I have had 0 communication with UGR and there is nothing that I want from them, end of story.
The BLACKMAILER can be found in the thread below. As I have stated before I have had 0 communication with UGR and there is nothing that I want from them, end of story.
The BLACKMAILER can be found in the thread below. As I have stated before I have had 0 communication with UGR and there is nothing that I want from them, end of story.
And as has been repeated incessantly... just what WAS your motive in doing research such as this in the first place? You don't just do background checks on people without some type of agenda in hand.
And as has been repeated incessantly... just what WAS your motive in doing research such as this in the first place? You don't just do background checks on people without some type of agenda in hand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleTrouble
I have been preparing for LITIGATION NOT BLACKMAIL, so FUCK YOU
I am guessing she has already answered this. I don't think its really uncommon to try and dig up information in a attempt to discredit someone involved in a legal issue.
The real q should be how she knows who this blackmailing person is and how the information got out in the first place.
It's your move Mrs. M. The entire Viper community is watching.
I hope for your, your husband, your business, and your customers that you clear the air ASAP.
And as has been repeated incessantly... just what WAS your motive in doing research such as this in the first place? You don't just do background checks on people without some type of agenda in hand.
One possible reason, as pointed out earlier in this thread, would be that UGR fixed Kenny's Viper, Kenny is "considering" litigation, and that Kevin would be (possibly) testifying as to the initial work done by said former tuner. The research could have been done to impeach Kevin's testimony based on his past should he testify.
Wendy, I remember you sent me an email stating my Macedo Warranty would be void if I let anyone even look at my car - referring to Joe Donovan, who was flying in to Ohio and wanted to check why my car was so badly tuned.
I didn't let Joe look at my car so I could keep my warranty and when I asked you about my Macedo Warranty you emailed me telling me Macedo doesn't have any warranties.
I could post the emails if you would like...it looked a lot like blackmail to me.
I find this rather amusing, see 'warranties' are funny things, and not even remotely so cut and dry.
What you are talking about is an express warranty. There are no "implied conditions" in contracts (although there are implied warranties as in this case). Your argument, in legal terms, is that M2 warranted that the goods were in a specific condition and when you inspected them they were not. As a result, the seller breached his/her express warranty concerning the nature of the goods. You may only be entitled to damages or a reduction in the price. You could have included a condition precedent in the agreement to the effect that the goods would be delivered as warranted or there would be no closing of the contract. But because you did not do that then you may be stuck with them, albeit at a lower price if the goods were something less than what was warranted (damages etc). All that notwithstanding, if there was an intentional misrepresentation of the nature or condition of the goods (which seems likely from the initial description), that would make the contract voidable (cancellable). There may also be the possibility of claiming a breach of implied warranty here.
I'm far from an attorney but find contract law rather interesting and knowing a thing or two has saved my ass in the past.
I'm not feeling like Sherlock Holmes today - could someone just tell me
who is the alleged guilty party in the linked thread.
I read the thread and have a few theories but you know what, it all doesn't matter at this point.
Underground Racing continues to build some amazing cars. So do some other tuners.
Kevin stood up like a man to some past indiscretions (which are hardly even newsworthy), so whoever did the original digging only proved in the end that they are possibly a nutcase, and Kevin is still a guy building great cars.
So, if I want to dig up some info on anyone here for any reason, I'll contact the nutcase.
If I want a really fast car, I'll call Underground.
Same old same old....
__________________
If strange things are ever happening, just reset your password. 62% of the time it works all the time.
One possible reason, as pointed out earlier in this thread, would be that UGR fixed Kenny's Viper, Kenny is "considering" litigation, and that Kevin would be (possibly) testifying as to the initial work done by said former tuner. The research could have been done to impeach Kevin's testimony based on his past should he testify.
I do see your point there... But those facts aren't relevant to his knowledge and experience in this case. You're not trying to get your accountant to testify, then come to find out he's wanted on numerous counts of tax evasion, fraud, embezzlement, etc. This stuff would hold no merit in court as far as I can tell.
It seems the hard facts and end result would be more than enough to accredit him.
