Just out of curiousity, what kind of dyno did you get your results on? "Dynojet" or "Mustang dyno." That does make a bit of a difference...as mustang dyno's typically read slightly lower than dynojets becuase of the added "resistance" intentionally put on their drums to account for rolling/wind resistance...
Did you dyno the car with the stock computer in it? I made 440 rwhp on my 02 with headers, kept the cats, cat-back. I did not have rockers in it, throttle bodies were unmodified.
As I previously mentioned, I don't think the 96 computer will yield more power without switching the cam.
Did you dyno the car with the stock computer in it? I made 440 rwhp on my 02 with headers, kept the cats, cat-back. I did not have rockers in it, throttle bodies were unmodified.
As I previously mentioned, I don't think the 96 computer will yield more power without switching the cam.
Mine was on a Dynojet and was SAE corrected, 432.4 rwhp, 474.2 rwtq.
2000 RT/10
Belanger Headers and 3" catbacks
3" in/out Randomtech hi flow cats
3.55 gears
lightweight flywheel
Smooths & K&Ns
I modded my 2000 GTS. I just dyno'd at 435 RWHP. What does this translate into BHP?
And does that sound right with the following?
KN intake
Belanger Headers
Roller Rockers
Modded Throttle body
Borla Exhaust
96 GTS Contoller
3.54 Gears
Car wash & Wax
I'd consider that an EXTREMELY low number for your mods. My car has made 411 to 414 (hot engine) and 421 (cool) for 10 years. It has 29,000 miles on the odo now, still running the OEM cats, mufflers and O2 sensors. I have some used TNT headers with Burns collectors in a box in the garage. When I ever get around to installing them, I expect about 18 hp gain with no other changes.
Linear Mode
