Go Back   Viper Alley - Dodge Viper Forum » Viper Alley » Viper Discussions - Gen I/Gen II
» Live Feed « · War Room · Graffiti Wall · Chat · Arcade · Viper Blogs · » Viper Tube «

Viper Discussions - Gen I/Gen II Discussions of Viper-related subjects covering Gen-I and Gen-II models.

       

1/4 Mile Testing Results of my '00 GTS

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

1/4 Mile Testing Results of my '00 GTS
Old August 15th, 2006, 12:03 PM   #1
n00b
 
JRW Viper is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 21
JRW Viper is unremarkable with 10 points
Rep Power: 0
1/4 Mile Testing Results of my '00 GTS

I finally got all the parts for my car on my car. I dynoed it and it gave me 514 rwhp on pump gas, 110 degree weather, and with no tuning at all. The car is Naturally asspirated (NA) with modified heads, rockers, pushrods, racing cam, headers, exhaust, throttle boddies, CF air box, short shifter, and BFG DR on the back. I testing the car on the track 6 times over 3 days (i.e. 2 runs per day). The track prep was got, and my burnouts and great (did not change the tire pressure). The first 2 runs I was not launching the car and only shifting from 1st to 2nd hard all the way through the RPM range. The one thing that is constant on every run is the car is unstable at the top end. The run I put the car in 3rd and crossed the finish line (115 mph) I actually crossed into the other lane in the breaking area, that is how unstable it is. Yesterday I decided to push the car harder, and Ran 12.2 at 117 mph with a 60ft of 2.0. I got off the gas at the finish and the car was really unstable.

Please give me some feedback on the following:

1. Tire pressures (note I use Nitrogen fills)
2. Best was to launch (drop the cluch or slip) I want good 60fts
3. Why the car is unstable??? How can I fix it.
4. What ET and Trap Speed should I be looking for?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 12:07 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
JZ 97 SS 1500 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 308
JZ 97 SS 1500 is unremarkable with 22 points
Rep Power: 0
What pressure are you running in the tires??

Also you should be looking for low 11's@127-130 with that kind of power.

What were your 1/8th mile times and speed??

As for launch, I usually slip mine with DR's. If it was full blown slicks, then you dump the clutch. Somewhere you are way off pace.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 12:36 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
-FROG-'s Avatar
 
-FROG- is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,607
-FROG- made Varsity with 769 points-FROG- made Varsity with 769 points-FROG- made Varsity with 769 points-FROG- made Varsity with 769 points-FROG- made Varsity with 769 points-FROG- made Varsity with 769 points-FROG- made Varsity with 769 points
Rep Power: 9
I was slipping my clutch on my Pilots and got some good 60ft's. I think I was running 11lbs in the rear and 20 up front on my tires. so what is tha car doing that is making it unstable? does it pull to the right? I know from running wrinkle wall slicks, cars feel a little mushy without the sidewall, but if you are running DR's it shouldn't be too bad. Why would it be so unstable at that speed? My car was just fine coming out at 115mph and I found out the other day, my alignment was all out of wack.
__________________
94' RT/10
12.1 @ 115 (1.87 60ft) on worn Pilots, cone filters and Dynomax w/no cats-406HP/475TQ
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 01:04 PM   #4
SAY NO TO PORK
 
v10kingsnake's Avatar
 
v10kingsnake is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 9,394
v10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 points
Rep Power: 22
no way in hell is this guy going to trap 127-130 with only 514 ish rwhp. NO WAY!!! maybe 121 or 122 tops. i trap 127-131mph with a 150 wet shot nx system in place pushing over 600 to the ground! your cam and head work should have net you over 550 and the fact is, many get those figures with simply bolt-on mods, like headers, full exhaust, smooth tubes, filters etc, tuning. i would tell you that it is unwise to run your car untuned especially after the head and cam swap to at least have the air fuel checked and make sure it isnt out of wack. my guess is that changing the motor like you did had an effect on the a/f ratio. if you cant get back to the dyno to check the a/f then pull some plugs and inspect.
__________________
UGR Paxton GTS
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 01:06 PM   #5
SAY NO TO PORK
 
v10kingsnake's Avatar
 
v10kingsnake is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 9,394
v10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 points
Rep Power: 22
i would also suggest that with a head and cam deal installed you get a vec2 at the very least to change the tune compensating for the swap. this could be where your lack of hp is at!
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 01:13 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
The Former PFR's Avatar
 
The Former PFR is online now
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 5,328
The Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 points
Rep Power: 16
If a 3150 pound Z06 can run 127 in the quarter with 505 crank, then there is NO reason why a GTS cannot run that high with a bit over 600 HP. Hell, I think Hennessey Venom 600s had traps in the low 130s back in the day.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 01:35 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
JZ 97 SS 1500 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 308
JZ 97 SS 1500 is unremarkable with 22 points
Rep Power: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by v10kingsnake View Post
no way in hell is this guy going to trap 127-130 with only 514 ish rwhp. NO WAY!!! maybe 121 or 122 tops. i trap 127-131mph with a 150 wet shot nx system in place pushing over 600 to the ground! your cam and head work should have net you over 550 and the fact is, many get those figures with simply bolt-on mods, like headers, full exhaust, smooth tubes, filters etc, tuning. i would tell you that it is unwise to run your car untuned especially after the head and cam swap to at least have the air fuel checked and make sure it isnt out of wack. my guess is that changing the motor like you did had an effect on the a/f ratio. if you cant get back to the dyno to check the a/f then pull some plugs and inspect.
A stock GTS will trap 121 with a good driver with almost 100rwhp less.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 02:09 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Mccarlin is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Algonquin, IL
Posts: 307
Mccarlin is well liked with 192 pointsMccarlin is well liked with 192 points
Rep Power: 5
Yeah those numbers seem low. I was at the track last week on stock pilots from 1999 (OLD and hard) and with NO burnout and stock tire pressure i ran a 12.6 @116 with a 2.3 60ft.
I'm basically stock besides exhaust and tubes.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 02:37 PM   #9
n00b
 
JRW Viper is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 21
JRW Viper is unremarkable with 10 points
Rep Power: 0
On the Dyno it showed that I'm running a little lean but not to much. I have ordered AEM and it will be here in a few days. But what I really need is your experience in what I can do to improve the times (driving tips) and stability of the car.

Your responses are highly appreciated.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 02:43 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
JZ 97 SS 1500 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 308
JZ 97 SS 1500 is unremarkable with 22 points
Rep Power: 0
What size BFG's are you running?? Also what psi did you run in them and what psi did you run in the front tires.

My car is pretty much stock and its trapping around 120-121, on stock tires
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 02:56 PM   #11
n00b
 
JRW Viper is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 21
JRW Viper is unremarkable with 10 points
Rep Power: 0
I think 35 psi on front and back. Back BFG DR are 18's.

Could it be the tire pressure making the car unstable at top end?
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:01 PM   #12
SAY NO TO PORK
 
v10kingsnake's Avatar
 
v10kingsnake is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 9,394
v10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 pointsv10kingsnake is The Man with 2072 points
Rep Power: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Former PFR View Post
If a 3150 pound Z06 can run 127 in the quarter with 505 crank, then there is NO reason why a GTS cannot run that high with a bit over 600 HP. Hell, I think Hennessey Venom 600s had traps in the low 130s back in the day.
i am not even going to comment on this rediculous statement you made other than you are incorrect and drop it. to trap 127-130 with the weight of a gts, you need a minimum of 575-600 rwhp. this guy already said he is at 514!
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:11 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Mccarlin is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Algonquin, IL
Posts: 307
Mccarlin is well liked with 192 pointsMccarlin is well liked with 192 points
Rep Power: 5
I would start the BFG's at about 18psi and the fronts to about 40psi. Since our cars have lots of low end torque revving up to 1500 or so and either slipping or dropping the clutch should be good. if it spins then launch at a lower RPM.

those are my experiences
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:15 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Anaconda is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,599
Anaconda made Varsity with 933 pointsAnaconda made Varsity with 933 pointsAnaconda made Varsity with 933 pointsAnaconda made Varsity with 933 pointsAnaconda made Varsity with 933 pointsAnaconda made Varsity with 933 pointsAnaconda made Varsity with 933 pointsAnaconda made Varsity with 933 points
Rep Power: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by v10kingsnake View Post
no way in hell is this guy going to trap 127-130 with only 514 ish rwhp. NO WAY!!! maybe 121 or 122 tops. i trap 127-131mph with a 150 wet shot nx system in place pushing over 600 to the ground!

Dunno what you are talking about, as my full weight 538 RWHP 2000 RT/10 (100 shot, VEC2, no cats, minor stuff like that) consistently trapped in the 128-129 range with that setup.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:18 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Mccarlin is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Algonquin, IL
Posts: 307
Mccarlin is well liked with 192 pointsMccarlin is well liked with 192 points
Rep Power: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by v10kingsnake View Post
i am not even going to comment on this rediculous statement you made other than you are incorrect and drop it. to trap 127-130 with the weight of a gts, you need a minimum of 575-600 rwhp. this guy already said he is at 514!


You sure about that? Check out some Ford GT times. they weigh right under 3400lbs and are in the low 500rwhp range and i've seen ~127mph traps from them.
My friend with a Ford GT, pulley and tune trapped 133 over the weekend.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:22 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
The Former PFR's Avatar
 
The Former PFR is online now
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 5,328
The Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 points
Rep Power: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anaconda View Post
Dunno what you are talking about, as my full weight 538 RWHP 2000 RT/10 (100 shot, VEC2, no cats, minor stuff like that) consistently trapped in the 128-129 range with that setup.
Thank you for some proof!
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:26 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
The Former PFR's Avatar
 
The Former PFR is online now
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 5,328
The Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 pointsThe Former PFR is The Man with 1552 points
Rep Power: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mccarlin View Post
You sure about that? Check out some Ford GT times. they weigh right under 3400lbs and are in the low 500rwhp range and i've seen ~127mph traps from them.
My friend with a Ford GT, pulley and tune trapped 133 over the weekend.
I have seen as high as 131 from them stock. The last one hennessey dynoed was 515 rwhp. So, there is NO REASON WHATSOEVER that a 514 RWHP GTS with a good driver, track, and tires cannot lay down 127 in the quarter. To argue any further would be futile.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:42 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
JZ 97 SS 1500 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 308
JZ 97 SS 1500 is unremarkable with 22 points
Rep Power: 0
A SRT runs 123-124 with 450rwhp....what is so hard to believe with 500+rwhp you can't run 127+? Still the 121 with 500rwhp is ridiculous. Sounds like driving lessons are in order if that is all the car is going.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:43 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
woodyz viper is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 915
woodyz viper is definately JV with 272 pointswoodyz viper is definately JV with 272 pointswoodyz viper is definately JV with 272 points
Rep Power: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRW Viper View Post
I finally got all the parts for my car on my car. I dynoed it and it gave me 514 rwhp on pump gas, 110 degree weather, and with no tuning at all. The car is Naturally asspirated (NA) with modified heads, rockers, pushrods, racing cam, headers, exhaust, throttle boddies, CF air box, short shifter, and BFG DR on the back. I testing the car on the track 6 times over 3 days (i.e. 2 runs per day). The track prep was got, and my burnouts and great (did not change the tire pressure). The first 2 runs I was not launching the car and only shifting from 1st to 2nd hard all the way through the RPM range. The one thing that is constant on every run is the car is unstable at the top end. The run I put the car in 3rd and crossed the finish line (115 mph) I actually crossed into the other lane in the breaking area, that is how unstable it is. Yesterday I decided to push the car harder, and Ran 12.2 at 117 mph with a 60ft of 2.0. I got off the gas at the finish and the car was really unstable.

Please give me some feedback on the following:

1. Tire pressures (note I use Nitrogen fills)
2. Best was to launch (drop the cluch or slip) I want good 60fts
3. Why the car is unstable??? How can I fix it.
4. What ET and Trap Speed should I be looking for?

Thanks
I think ' WANTED ' would be the best guy to ask re: the best way to get the car down the track.
To my knowledge he's found the best combination to obtain the best times with what you have.
  Reply With Quote

Old August 15th, 2006, 03:43 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
JZ 97 SS 1500 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 308
JZ 97 SS 1500 is unremarkable with 22 points
Rep Power: 0
I just ran this weekend with a set of 255 MT radials. They were set at 20psi and the fronts at 40psi. Car is stable up to 160-170 or so.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

  Viper Alley - Dodge Viper Forum » Viper Alley » Viper Discussions - Gen I/Gen II


Thread Tools
Display Modes
Postbit Selector
Switch to Left (legacy) postbit Use Vertical (Legacy) Postbit

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1/4 Mile Testing '00 GTS (Part 2) JRW Viper