Can ANYONE answer this???

Denny Wagner · January 26th, 2005, 07:59 AM

This morning, a weatherman on a Canadian satellite tv station I was watching said:

"Today's high temperature will be 0 degrees, and because of an arctic cold front moving thru, tomorrow it will be twice as cold"

So, can someone please tell me what tomorrows high temp will be????

Den

GTS Dean · January 26th, 2005, 08:01 AM

viper spray · January 26th, 2005, 08:03 AM

WED

75°F
in Austin

**HighRoller** · January 26th, 2005, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denny BigWang

This morning, a weatherman on a Canadian satellite tv station I was watching said:

"Today's high temperature will be 0 degrees, and because of an arctic cold front moving thru, tomorrow it will be twice as cold"

So, can someone please tell me what tomorrows high temp will be????

Den

Are you the same guy who runs around grocery stores complaining about the "10 items or less?" signs?

**Evil** · January 26th, 2005, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighRoller

Are you the same guy who runs around grocery stores complaining about the "10 items or less?" signs?

Yep. It's also the guy with the drinking problem that lives with his cats. :thumb:

Genetic Cesspool · January 26th, 2005, 09:04 AM

Well, the high temp was 0 but you didn't tell us what the low temp was. The weather man was saying it will be twice as cold tomorrow and since we all know that the temperature never stays exactly the same the entire day, he most likely was referring to the low temp or average of the day.

If you tell us what the low temp is, we can answer your question.

[/end smart ass reasoning]

**HighRoller** · January 26th, 2005, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evilz_ACR

Yep. It's also the guy with the drinking problem that lives with his cats. :thumb:

Ouch. Ok, deserved that.

But my cats are COOL. Ask Rockstar. (oooops, this is just making it worse)

**_Mark_** · January 26th, 2005, 09:17 AM

Simple! Being a Canadian broadcast most likely means the 0 was in Celsius, indicating a perfect 32 degrees Fahrenheit if we translate to our more familiar scale. Now recently I read a study that said the ideal human "comfortable" temperature was 75 degrees F. This means that if we define "cold" as a measure below ideal comfort, it was 43 degrees below ideal. If it were then to be twice as cold, we would expect a temperature of 86 degrees below ideal, placing us at -11 degrees fahrenheit. If we then convert back to celsius, we calculate a temperature of -23.8 degrees Celsius.

**HighRoller** · January 26th, 2005, 09:23 AM

Ok, if we're taking the mathematical approach, then this is clearly what the guy meant:

"Today it's colder than a witch's tit. Tomorrow it will be colder than both of them."

NOITALL · January 26th, 2005, 09:56 AM

fuck canada

**RockStar** · January 26th, 2005, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig201MPH

fuck canada

Agreed. We don't even have hockey to be proud of right now.

And it's fucking freezing!

I'm moving to Buffalo.

Genetic Cesspool · January 26th, 2005, 10:17 AM

Oh sure RockStar, you're moving down south to enjoy the warm weather! Traitor!

(PS...I agree with the other 2 Canadians...fuck Canada).

**RockStar** · January 26th, 2005, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genetic Cesspool

Oh sure RockStar, you're moving down south to enjoy the warm weather! Traitor!

I can see Buffalo from my front door and it looks so sunny and inviting.

Of course I'll have to get used to the increased smog levels, the corrupt cops, the constant threat to my personal safety, the democratic party, the poverty, and the downright rudeness, but I think I'll survive. After all......cheap booze!

Genetic Cesspool · January 26th, 2005, 10:28 AM

Well, the beer isn't cheaper. Sure it is less expensive per beer, but you'll have to drink 67 of them to get drunk.

**RockStar** · January 26th, 2005, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genetic Cesspool

Well, the beer isn't cheaper. Sure it is less expensive per beer, but you'll have to drink 67 of them to get drunk.

Beer? WTF is beer?

**PBG** · January 26th, 2005, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genetic Cesspool

Well, the beer isn't cheaper. Sure it is less expensive per beer, but you'll have to drink 67 of them to get drunk.

ooof, reminds me of my first trip to Colorado and discovering 3.2 beer. I thought I would explode I drank so much before I realized what the problem was....That drive from the Denver airport to Aspen took forever, drink 3, stop and pee, drink 3 stop and pee....

**Minivan Man** · January 26th, 2005, 10:46 AM

So your bladder can hold 36 ounces of liquid. For some reason, I wouldn've been okay not knowing that.

**PBG** · January 26th, 2005, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schill

So your bladder can hold 36 ounces of liquid. For some reason, I wouldn've been okay not knowing that.

eew, leave it to you to bring out that perspective. At least I didn't mention how much more room you had to drink if you puked...