and I will never understand is why Mike and Blower are so against Bush.
If all they can say is, "he lied about WMD" then all I can say is get a clue. It's not like anyone here has never done something on miss-information. Did you lie? Kerry approved the war. If any of you were president and the billions of dollars spent on intelligence, along with Russia, UK and Turkey intelligence said Iraq had WMD, wouldn't you believe them? Would you want to be held responsible if he did and he sold them to terrorists and it killed thousands more American "innocent children"? Note that we haven't even checked boardering countries yet. The mobile chemical labs Iraq bought from France sure look interesting, don't they? Saddam supported terrorist groups. Are the libs the kind of people that would rather sit on their asses and masturbate until another terrorist strike occurs and then say, "oh the humanity... why ME!???!!! PITY ME!!!" The libs harp on not having international support. Read the facts, Saddam was buying our support off. Kerry would never have had it either.
If any of you libs can tell me one credible, concrete reason why Kerry is a better choice for President than Bush and factually back it up, I will never question your credibility again.
and I will never understand is why Mike and Blower are so against Bush.
If all they can say is, "he lied about WMD" then all I can say is get a clue. It's not like anyone here has never done something on miss-information. Did you lie? Kerry approved the war. If any of you were president and the billions of dollars spent on intelligence, along with Russia, UK and Turkey intelligence said Iraq had WMD, wouldn't you believe them? Would you want to be held responsible if he did and he sold them to terrorists and it killed thousands more American "innocent children"? Note that we haven't even checked boardering countries yet. The mobile chemical labs Iraq bought from France sure look interesting, don't they? Saddam supported terrorist groups. Are the libs the kind of people that would rather sit on their asses and masturbate until another terrorist strike occurs and then say, "oh the humanity... why ME!???!!! PITY ME!!!" The libs harp on not having international support. Read the facts, Saddam was buying our support off. Kerry would never have had it either.
If any of you libs can tell me one credible, concrete reason why Kerry is a better choice for President than Bush and factually back it up, I will never question your credibility again.
Fact Kerry has fought in war himself, fact Bush hasn't. No go vote for Kerry! Kerry isn't claiming he wants to play anything safe - his message is we want clear focus on the right people and the right tactics. FACT - Iraq was a big fucking waste of time and money. FACT - there are "terrorist" states that do have WMD that are more dangerous than Iraq. Try to think outside the box on this one - we didn't get world support on Iraq because the world knew damn well what everyone knows now - Iraq wasn't a world threat before the war and they sure as hell aren't now! Cast your vote for Kerry and lets get a president that can finish a sentence for christ sake!
Fact Kerry has fought in war himself, fact Bush hasn't.
Just because someone fought in a war... or... doctored documents about what he did, doesn't make him more fit to be commander in chief. Just ask his comrades.
Quote:
FACT - Iraq was a big fucking waste of time and money.
Who are you fooling? The war in Iraq had to happen sooner or later. Billions of dollars in intelligence telling us that Saddam is supporting terrorism. Saddam kicking out inspectors. If it wasn't Bush, it would have been the next president. Your statement seems more opinion, because I, and many many others believe it was not a waste of time and money.
Quote:
FACT - there are "terrorist" states that do have WMD that are more dangerous than Iraq.
This isn't a reason why Kerry is better than Bush. Besides, Iraq was the most viable option. It is centrally located, contained the most "powerful" military in the Middle East, and harbored not only terrorists, but also a corrupt dictator. You think Iraq was a big waste? All the other countries we could've striked were bigger wastes, fool. North Korea is out of the question.
Quote:
Try to think outside the box on this one - we didn't get world support on Iraq because the world knew damn well what everyone knows now - Iraq wasn't a world threat before the war and they sure as hell aren't now!
Try to research outside the box. You are making yourself look like a dolt by not knowing the truth. Quit lying to us. You're just as bad as Bush.
I still have not seen one good reason out of any democrat on this board. It's rather pathetic. All you guys can do is spout off the typical liberal media spun non-researched verbal diarrhea. Is that all you have?
All I see going on is that when the Democrats do something the Democrats like, it's a good thing, but when Republicans do the same thing later on, the Democrats say it's a bad thing. Time and time again, it happens.....
Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - good... Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad...
Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - good... Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - bad...
Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good...Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad...
Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists - good...
Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad...
Clinton bombs Chinese embassy - good...Bush bombs terrorist camps - bad...
Clinton commits felonies while in office - good... Bush lands on aircraft carrier in flightsuit - bad...
No mass graves found in Serbia - good... No WMD found Iraq - bad...
Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton - good... Economy on upswing under Bush - bad...
Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good... World Trade Centers fall under Bush - bad...
Clinton says Saddam has nukes - good...Bush says Saddam has nukes - bad...
Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq- good... Bush imposes regime change in Iraq -bad...
Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - good... Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - bad...
Milosevic not yet convicted - good... Saddam turned over for trial - bad...
Fact Kerry has fought in war himself, fact Bush hasn't. No go vote for Kerry! Kerry isn't claiming he wants to play anything safe - his message is we want clear focus on the right people and the right tactics. FACT - Iraq was a big fucking waste of time and money. FACT - there are "terrorist" states that do have WMD that are more dangerous than Iraq. Try to think outside the box on this one - we didn't get world support on Iraq because the world knew damn well what everyone knows now - Iraq wasn't a world threat before the war and they sure as hell aren't now! Cast your vote for Kerry and lets get a president that can finish a sentence for christ sake!
Linear Mode
