| Anything Goes Well, almost anything. Bring your A game or be sent home. |
Front Engine or Mid Engine?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 06:34 PM
|
#21
|
|
The Burn Clinic
Smackie is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: TX & CA
Posts: 12,778
Rep Power: 21
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
Try www.radicalwest.com . That's the guy we use. The corporate site is mostly Euro stuff outside of the OTC coverage and Runoffs coverage.
They use Hayabusa motors. The chassis is epic.
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 06:40 PM
|
#22
|
|
Focus!
CS is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,556
Rep Power: 17
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Smackie
Try www.radicalwest.com . That's the guy we use. The corporate site is mostly Euro stuff outside of the OTC coverage and Runoffs coverage.
They use Hayabusa motors. The chassis is epic.
|
Busa motors?! Wow - that sounds pretty sick, although don't they have a problem with a lack of torque?
What makes it handle so well? Geometry?
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 06:42 PM
|
#23
|
|
Viperalley Regional Mgr.
NOITALL is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,244
Rep Power: 19
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
shit, busa motors! That must just sound amazing.
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 06:56 PM
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
tito is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,151
Rep Power: 9
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
when i was 15 i wanted a MR2 so bad. Now that im 60 i lust after a Murci.
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 07:59 PM
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Nameless is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,927
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
Your 60? Damn your old [img]/images/graemlins/laughing.gif[/img]
No offense of course..
MM
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 08:02 PM
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
tito is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,151
Rep Power: 9
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
speak up sonny! whats that you say?? no i'm not cold. . mumble..mumble... damn kids.
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 08:43 PM
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Nameless is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,927
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
[img]/images/graemlins/supergrin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/supergrin.gif[/img]
MM
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 10:44 PM
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
GTS Bruce is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 586
Rep Power: 7
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
Best static balance somewhere near 44/56 front/rear. Bruce
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine? |
 |
November 18th, 2003, 11:07 PM
|
#29
|
|
The Burn Clinic
Smackie is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: TX & CA
Posts: 12,778
Rep Power: 21
|
Re: Front Engine or Mid Engine?
On what, Bruce..your riding mower? There is no universal "best".
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM. |
|
|