View Single Post

Old October 7th, 2007, 12:00 PM   #13
Kiaser
Senior Member
 
Kiaser's Avatar
 
Kiaser is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,199
Kiaser is definately a better person than you are with 433 pointsKiaser is definately a better person than you are with 433 pointsKiaser is definately a better person than you are with 433 pointsKiaser is definately a better person than you are with 433 pointsKiaser is definately a better person than you are with 433 points
Rep Power: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by BADVENOM View Post
Casey

I believe that also but don't you think we actually went after the wrong country>If you recall just a few month before the war started Saddam was actually shitting in his pants .He let inspectors in towards the end but nothing came up. The same time we had Syria and Iran, both hard core fanatical gov'ts which want to put an end to America and Isreal. The bottom line is that all is correct but are we in the right war with the right country???That's what I'm pointing at. I never thought Iraq was in any way some strong country to harm us.With there own war between Iran they were crippled pretty bad. Knowing this why would we go in this country? Why didn't we go into Syria or IRAN.we knew Iran was trying to build nuclear power back then.We knew that the gov't of Syria is a corrupt gov't causing shit in the mid east to keep it unstable. Look at BEIRUT.Syria constantly causes trouble between Christians and Muslims that live there.They assasinated the Beirut PM....So back to what I was saying..Are we in the right war?
All I know is if I was playing a real-time strategy game I would definetely want to setup base in the middle of a region I plan on dominating later in the game. But that's only if the superweapons (ie: nukes) were not allowed in the game, otherwise I'd just turtle and put all money into defenses and building up my own economy to drive my war machine.

Command & Conquer Generals, try it sometime.
  Reply With Quote