Thread: For The Record
View Single Post

Old July 25th, 2007, 01:48 PM   #137
boplaw
contemptuous
 
boplaw's Avatar
 
boplaw is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edge of America
Posts: 3,934
boplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 pointsboplaw is The Man with 1706 points
Rep Power: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROGUE GTS View Post
I do see your point there... But those facts aren't relevant to his knowledge and experience in this case. You're not trying to get your accountant to testify, then come to find out he's wanted on numerous counts of tax evasion, fraud, embezzlement, etc. This stuff would hold no merit in court as far as I can tell.

It seems the hard facts and end result would be more than enough to accredit him.
Usually there is a time limit on whether or not a conviction for a crime of moral turpitude is admissible to impeach a witness. For instance, here in SC it is 10 years.

Geezus, and to think I rib my wife about watching the Soap Channel........
  Reply With Quote