View Single Post

Old March 7th, 2007, 05:30 PM   #8
Boiler
Senior Member
 
Boiler's Avatar
 
Boiler is online now
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Williston, ND
Posts: 2,505
Boiler made Varsity with 966 pointsBoiler made Varsity with 966 pointsBoiler made Varsity with 966 pointsBoiler made Varsity with 966 pointsBoiler made Varsity with 966 pointsBoiler made Varsity with 966 pointsBoiler made Varsity with 966 pointsBoiler made Varsity with 966 points
Rep Power: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanked View Post
If you want the national average fuel economy to go up....try banning full size SUV's. Maybe it's just me, but I don't get the whole my SUV is bigger than your's mantality. I just don't get why you need to drive something so huge when you are the lone occupant. If there are 5 people in that suv...don't ya think the CLK500 or RX330 would work just as nice (try to park downtown with a full size SUV.) Most of the time it's just one person in it when I drive by one. (Yes, my daily driver is my company
Maybe because some families need the full size suv's lets see you take a family of 6 to Florida from Indiana in the CLK500 or the RX330, I can tell you right now at least 3 of the family members will not make it down because they got thrown out along the way, not to mention there would be no place for luggage.

I do agree that if you have a family of 4 or smaller there is NO NEED for a full size suv, an explorer sized vehicle will work just fine.

Like I have been telling all of the international people that I am training with, people do not need the full size SUV they have it because they can, for some reason they give me the WTF face.
__________________
"ferrets possess many upstanding qualities, such as suicidal curosity"

'Everyone says Fomulah One's too bowring bleh bleh bleh...'

"SpeedChannel - Less racing than Al Jazeera."
  Reply With Quote