Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Smokin
I cant believe there are really that many people who dont "get this concept". It seems there are some fucktards here that think that "getting their feelings hurt" is the same as experiencing "real world intervetion". Real world intervention is far worse than ANY OTHER type of violation here. It has actual implications that may affect someones personal life (Financial, family, security, etc). Other than stating the obvious, real world is a concept that is impossible to define using a blanket defintion. One thing that may be "real world" for one person may not bother another person whatsoever. Take "fast freddy" for example. The fucker posted his own DRIVERS LICENSE on the internet. 99% of everyone else would call that real world intervention if it made it up on the board. Some guys here mind if their last name is posted others couldnt give two shits. Its discretional and is going to vary from case to case. You just cant define it, and thats why we have moderators. IMO most of the time ..... ITS VERY CLEAR what is and is not real world. Its not rocket science its common sense. Now after that, if the Beta Males and Beta Females here cant figure it out, tell them to jump off a cliff and end themselves now. They are so Goddamned pathetic and idiotic that they dont deserve to consume any more air.
|
I agree with Smokin in that anyone with common sense can understand what the "real word" is and the related implications it encompasses.
Interestingly, Emilie's first post was not deleted although I would think that was pretty "real world" especially when there's allegations of Smokin kickin' somebody in the head and the posting of a private AIM conversation. However, I didn't see him having a cow and immediately removing it although I'm sure that he would be justified in doing that under the rules if he wanted to.
To those that have a beef with the mods, what are your specific concerns? Is it the definition of "real world" or is it the lack of consistency with the enforcement of the rules, (I'm not saying that there IS an inconsistent application of the rules, just that I think that may be an issue with some), or what?