View Single Post

Re: Paxton vs. Roe SC
Old February 2nd, 2004, 12:19 AM   #5
MbnViper
Viper Love
 
MbnViper's Avatar
 
MbnViper is offline
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 543
MbnViper is well liked with 184 pointsMbnViper is well liked with 184 points
Rep Power: 7
Re: Paxton vs. Roe SC

to be fair I never saw/owned a centrifugal supercharger, anyway ill speak from my experience with Roe chargers (Twin screw), and my knowledge, since day one from my charger installation I noticed a hug deference In driving my snake,

I mean I can feel the torque the second I smash the car, my car easier to drive now around the city, im not an expert but I feel its more lighter and responding so quick.

dynosheets showed the Roe charger with this beautiful torque curve (almost a straight line I don’t know if you still call it “Curve line” anymore lol)

also few Roe chargers owners compared there dynosheets with some 850RWHP++ Turbo snakes, they have the same RWHP until something like 3000RPM not bad I guess, few in this forum are running mid/low 10’s with the Roe S/C. keep in mind all this with no intercooler/aftercooler [img]/images/graemlins/supergrin.gif[/img]

What Roe charger needs right now is an intercooler/aftercooler and then run more boost and let us see the numbers, give it some time.

My opinion and its just me, I think Screw superchargers is the future of boosting, not just in a viper cars in general. (I could be wrong)

That may sound strange, but im a turbo fan, and Screw chargers do reminds me of them (torque maybe), why and how I dont know, I just do. Take care
  Reply With Quote