View Single Post

Re: RSI 1059 RWHP - Fact or BS ?
Old December 5th, 2003, 07:21 PM   #37
CS
Focus!
 
CS's Avatar
 
CS is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,544
CS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 pointsCS made Varsity with 1456 points
Rep Power: 17
Re: RSI 1059 RWHP - Fact or BS ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by houstonT
Torque, you are absolutely right. I've said for a LONG time that I think this motor can handle MUCH more power than the supra motor. I think this particular car can handle 1300 rwhp, but who knows...??? We'll find out when they eventually spray the motor...
Longevity, i'm not sure Clint. I think back to 2000 when someone told me that the stock bottom end on my car (supra) could only handle a max of 650 rwhp. Shoot, three years later, I was making 960 rwhp and still on the stock motor. Only time will tell...
Peter
I think it's all in the tuning; the more smooth the blower and fuel comes on, the easier it is on the motor. Great point re: the Supra. The bottom end is real strong on the Viper V-10 - I was just curious .
  Reply With Quote