View Single Post

Re: RSI 1059 RWHP - Fact or BS ?
Old December 4th, 2003, 11:31 PM   #14
SRT Mike
Senior Member
 
SRT Mike is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,290
SRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 pointsSRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 pointsSRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 pointsSRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 pointsSRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 pointsSRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 pointsSRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 pointsSRT Mike made Varsity with 1024 points
Rep Power: 13
Re: RSI 1059 RWHP - Fact or BS ?

There is a limit on how much power you can make vs. displacement, and I personally don't think 1059RWHP is that close to the max limit, although probably not TOO far off it.

It's not just about PSI, it's about how much air. A 1/4" hose at 20psi is flowing less air than a 5-foot duct at 10psi. The reason BS was called before is that if a motor is stock, then the flow doesn't change - so PSI is the only factor. But in a modified motor, flow is very important. A free breathing motor sucking in 16psi could be making a lot more power than a stocker.

If you figure, for example, that a 510cid stroker made 600RWHP, and since ambient is around 14psi, and they are at 16psi, they are putting in 115% more air and the theoretical limit would, I believe, be 115% of what the motor was making without any boost, which would be 1,285RWHP. 1,059RWHP is 82% of the theoretical most they could get... so are they able to squeeze that much out? I don't know how 82% rates for a number, but to me it sounds like it's within the bounds of reason. Furthermore, is it really 16.0PSI? Guages aren't 100% accurate and boost changes with RPM, so maybe it's 16.9 or the guage has a 1.5psi error range... and who knows how well they can build a motor? Maybe they can get a fair bit more than 600RWHP on a stroker? Wasn't LPE around the 700+RWHP range on their big motor package?

However you slice it, 1059RWHP on 16psi on a well tuned stroker is certainly within the bounds of reason, IMO.
  Reply With Quote