Quote:
Originally Posted by The Former PFR
Uhhhh...you realize the CPE car is making MORE HP than torque (desirable) and you are making less HP than torque? Not only that, the CPE kit is using much smaller turbos to do so. I'd imagine you have a problem somewhere.
|
We are clear that his dynograph is on atleast 5 psi more then mine?
You do realize my twin 76mm car is making:
50ish ft. lbs. and 50ish rwhp more at 70 mph
100ish ft. lbs. and 75ish rwhp more at 80 mph
125ish ft. lbs. and 100ish rwhp more at 90 mph
180ish ft. lbs. and 150ish rwhp more at 100 mph
50ish ft. lbs. and 60ish rwhp more at 110 mph
From there up he obviously has the advantage....as his car is on more boost.
I am assuming our speed's match just as good rpm's would, unless his car had some sort of gear changing.
You also realize that a big factor the the hp and torque graphs are when the car makes boost? If my car didn't make 8-9 psi at 4k then I am sure the torque would not be so high. Why is it desirable to make more hp then torque again? I think that depends on the user's end goals not some blanket statement.
Again I am not trying to directly compare kits, I just dont have anything else to compare to.
It's funny that in the beginning of the thread people were telling me about blowing up the stock motor and how stupid it was to use such large turbo's. I show up with a dyno graph of a car making great low end power, on low boost, low timing and now people are telling me I am leaving power on the table. I understand and after the customer enjoys the car for awhile, we will have our own dynograph with more boost.